Loading from the repository — every figure will carry its evidence class and lineage.
Loading from the repository — every figure will carry its evidence class and lineage.
Recovered facility power becomes recovered IT power becomes accelerator-equivalent capacity. Each is priced three ways — energy, capacity, compute — and the three are never added together. Compute value is counted only in hours where facility power or cooling actually constrains compute; as modeled that is 0 % of hours.
Engine run 78a2537c + compute run af4bfbb5 on cooling prior B ac chiller dry (evidence weight 0.45). Public remote observation established the roof spectral/thermal behaviour; the whole-system model says the plant, not the roof, holds the recoverable opportunity — but every plant number is conditional on an inferred degradation state that has not been observed.
Recovered kWh × hourly settlement-point price. Realized whether or not the facility is constrained.
Counted only in hours where power or cooling capacity binds: 0 % under the facility-cap prior, 100 % in the sensitivity column.
7,006 kW IT · 5,495 accelerator-equivalents. Marginal contribution is an assumed sensitivity; the gross ceiling is public on-demand price × units, never profit.
The whole-system model puts the recoverable opportunity in heat rejection and air distribution, not the roof. But every row is conditional: if the plant is in the assumed as-found state (fouled coils, loaded filters, scaled fill, conservative setpoint), then the modeled recoverable opportunity is the figure shown. No mechanical fault has been observed at this campus.
| Intervention | As-found state assumed | Facility peak kW | MWh / yr | Energy value / yr | Modeled cost | $ / kW | Payback (energy) | IT capacity | Capacity lens (if constrained) | Δ CO₂e | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coil cleaning Clean fouled dry-cooler / condenser coils | Coil fouled | 28,947 | $0 as modeled · 0 % constrained hours | Pending | ModeledInferred | ||||||
Filter replacement Replace loaded CRAH/AHU filters | Filter loaded | 20,771 | $0 as modeled · 0 % constrained hours | Pending | ModeledInferred | ||||||
CHWS optimization Raise chilled-water supply setpoint 2 °F | Setpoint conservative | 9,057 | $0 as modeled · 0 % constrained hours | Pending | ModeledInferred | ||||||
Roof intervention Apply reflective coating | Soiled moderate | 49 | $0 as modeled · 0 % constrained hours | Pending | ModeledInferred | ||||||
Roof intervention Hose-wash soiled roofs | Soiled moderate | 28 | $0 as modeled · 100 % constrained hours | Pending | ModeledInferred | ||||||
Roof intervention Pressure-wash soiled roofs | Soiled moderate | 28 | $0 as modeled · 0 % constrained hours | Pending | ModeledInferred | ||||||
Equipment yard Treat equipment-yard ground surface | Yard surface hot | 0 | $0 as modeled · 0 % constrained hours | Pending | ModeledInferred |
Bands (open any number) are the engine's coherent favorable/unfavorable worlds. Costs are class priors from the knowledge layer (ASSUMED). BAS trends — condenser approach, filter ΔP, tower approach — are what would move these rows from modeled to observed.
Recovered facility power becomes IT capacity becomes accelerator-equivalents. Whether that capacity is worth anything depends on one thing the model cannot see: whether the facility is actually power- or cooling-constrained. So the chain is shown twice — as modeled under the facility-cap prior, and as the engine's sensitivity with the facility constrained every hour.
| Campus, all inferred states recovered | As modeledfacility cap prior · 0 % constrained hours | If power-constrainedsensitivity · 100 % constrained hours |
|---|---|---|
Facility peak recoverable if every inferred as-found state exists | ||
→ IT capacity through distribution / conversion efficiency | ||
→ accelerator-equivalents IT kW ÷ platform system power | ||
→ compute units / yr only in constrained hours | ||
Energy value realized either way | ||
Capacity value constrained hours only | ||
Gross compute ceiling public on-demand price × units — never profit | ||
Marginal contribution — low assumed sensitivity | ||
Marginal contribution — base assumed sensitivity | ||
Marginal contribution — high assumed sensitivity |
Inferred capacity chain (facility → IT → accelerator-equivalents) · Assumed compute economics. The physical recovery is the same in both columns; only the hours in which it can be sold differ. Energy, capacity and compute values are three lenses on the same kW and are never summed.
Available-compute kW is the physical layer's recovered facility headroom for every intervention. Accelerator-equivalents and the compute economics come from the compute layer, which has run for roof interventions and the campus lost-compute map; plant interventions show the physical layer's capacity lens and are marked pending for the rest until the compute layer runs for them.
| Intervention | Facility peak kW | Available compute kW | Accelerator-equivalents | As modeled | Capacity lens if constrained | Gross ceiling if constrained | Marginal (base) if constrained | Payback with compute | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Combined interventions Hose-wash soiled roofs + Clean fouled dry-cooler / condenser coils + Replace loaded CRAH/AHU filters + Treat equipment-yard ground surface | $0 0 % hrs | physical layer only | |||||||
Combined interventions Hose-wash soiled roofs + Clean fouled dry-cooler / condenser coils | $0 0 % hrs | physical layer only | |||||||
Coil cleaning Clean fouled dry-cooler / condenser coils | $0 0 % hrs | physical layer only | |||||||
Filter replacement Replace loaded CRAH/AHU filters | $0 0 % hrs | physical layer only | |||||||
CHWS optimization Raise chilled-water supply setpoint 2 °F | $0 0 % hrs | physical layer only | |||||||
Roof intervention Apply reflective coating | $0 0 % hrs | physical layer only | |||||||
Roof intervention Hose-wash soiled roofs | $0 0 % hrs | compute layer | |||||||
Roof intervention Pressure-wash soiled roofs | $0 0 % hrs | physical layer only |
Joint counterfactuals versus the sum of the individual ones. Negative interaction value means the interventions partially overlap (a cleaner condenser leaves less for the fill to recover).
| Interventions | Facility peak kW | MWh / yr | Energy value / yr | Cost | Payback (y) | Interaction value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hose-wash soiled roofs + Clean fouled dry-cooler / condenser coils + Replace loaded CRAH/AHU filters + Treat equipment-yard ground surface | 49,341 | Peak kw recovered -87 · Energy saved mwh yr -404 · Compute kw recovered -87 | ||||
| Hose-wash soiled roofs + Clean fouled dry-cooler / condenser coils | 28,971 | Peak kw recovered -3 · Energy saved mwh yr -4 · Compute kw recovered -3 |
Roof heat is a small term in a data-center heat balance, so restoring reflectance recovers little facility power. Its value is different: the roof state is observed from orbit, a wash test is cheap, and the result is visible within weeks — it validates the observation → model chain that the mechanical rows depend on. Dirt causation remains a hypothesis until that test.
| Intervention (all soiled roofs jointly) | Facility peak kW | MWh / yr | Energy value / yr | Cost | $ / IT kW | Payback (energy only) | Accelerator-eq | Gross compute ceiling (if constrained) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apply reflective coating General Roof 1 · DATA_HALL_01 · General Roof 2 · DATA_HALL_03 · General Roof 3 · DATA_HALL_02 · General Roof 4 · DATA_HALL_04 · General Roof 5 · CENTRAL_CORE · General Roof 7 · DATA_HALL_02 | 48.9 | |||||||
| Hose-wash soiled roofs General Roof 1 · DATA_HALL_01 · General Roof 2 · DATA_HALL_03 · General Roof 3 · DATA_HALL_02 · General Roof 4 · DATA_HALL_04 · General Roof 5 · CENTRAL_CORE · General Roof 7 · DATA_HALL_02 | 27.8 | |||||||
| Pressure-wash soiled roofs General Roof 1 · DATA_HALL_01 · General Roof 2 · DATA_HALL_03 · General Roof 3 · DATA_HALL_02 · General Roof 4 · DATA_HALL_04 · General Roof 5 · CENTRAL_CORE · General Roof 7 · DATA_HALL_02 | 27.8 |
Observed albedo is the engine's 60-day window (Sentinel-2 v2, qa pass). Targets: peer median (observed), own best 30 days (observed upper bound), manufacturer age-adjusted prior (via an ASSUMED S2→SR scale).
| Roof | Target | Observed albedo (60 d) | Target albedo | Uplift (SR-eq) | Facility peak kW | kWh / yr | Energy value / yr | Cost | Payback (y) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| General Roof 1 · DATA_HALL_01visibly soiled | Historical best 30d | 0.532 | 0.754 | 0.145 | 4,410 | 44 | |||
| General Roof 1 · DATA_HALL_01visibly soiled | Manufacturer prior at age | 0.532 | 0.540 | 0.011 | 363 | 545 | |||
| General Roof 1 · DATA_HALL_01visibly soiled | Peer median now | 0.532 | 0.533 | 0.001 | 43 | 4,640 | |||
| General Roof 2 · DATA_HALL_03visibly soiled | Historical best 30d | 0.498 | 0.732 | 0.190 | 5,860 | 34 | |||
| General Roof 2 · DATA_HALL_03visibly soiled | Manufacturer prior at age | 0.498 | 0.540 | 0.057 | 1,813 | 110 | |||
| General Roof 2 · DATA_HALL_03visibly soiled | Peer median now | 0.498 | 0.533 | 0.046 | 1,492 | 133 | |||
| General Roof 3 · DATA_HALL_02visibly soiled | Historical best 30d | 0.569 | 0.769 | 0.094 | 2,828 | 69 | |||
| General Roof 3 · DATA_HALL_02visibly soiled | Manufacturer prior at age | 0.569 | 0.540 | 0.000 | 0 | 0 | |||
| General Roof 3 · DATA_HALL_02visibly soiled | Peer median now | 0.569 | 0.533 | 0.000 | 0 | 0 | |||
| General Roof 4 · DATA_HALL_04visibly soiled | Historical best 30d | 0.490 | 0.700 | 0.201 | 6,200 | 32 | |||
| General Roof 4 · DATA_HALL_04visibly soiled | Manufacturer prior at age | 0.490 | 0.540 | 0.067 | 2,153 | 92 | |||
| General Roof 4 · DATA_HALL_04visibly soiled | Peer median now | 0.490 | 0.533 | 0.057 | 1,833 | 109 | |||
| General Roof 5 · CENTRAL_COREvisibly soiled | Historical best 30d | 0.479 | 0.705 | 0.216 | 4,282 | 29 | |||
| General Roof 5 · CENTRAL_COREvisibly soiled | Manufacturer prior at age | 0.479 | 0.539 | 0.081 | 1,656 | 77 | |||
| General Roof 5 · CENTRAL_COREvisibly soiled | Peer median now | 0.479 | 0.533 | 0.072 | 1,490 | 85 | |||
| General Roof 6 · CENTRAL_CORE | Historical best 30d | 0.542 | 0.693 | 0.131 | 2,559 | 49 | |||
| General Roof 6 · CENTRAL_CORE | Manufacturer prior at age | 0.542 | 0.541 | 0.000 | 0 | 0 | |||
| General Roof 6 · CENTRAL_CORE | Peer median now | 0.542 | 0.533 | 0.000 | 0 | 0 | |||
| General Roof 7 · DATA_HALL_02visibly soiled | Historical best 30d | 0.534 | 0.711 | 0.142 | 4,325 | 45 | |||
| General Roof 7 · DATA_HALL_02visibly soiled | Manufacturer prior at age | 0.534 | 0.540 | 0.009 | 278 | 713 | |||
| General Roof 7 · DATA_HALL_02visibly soiled | Peer median now | 0.534 | 0.533 | 0.000 | 0 | 0 | |||
| General Roof 8 · DATA_HALL_01clean-control candidate | Historical best 30d | 0.548 | 0.735 | 0.122 | 3,697 | 53 | |||
| General Roof 8 · DATA_HALL_01clean-control candidate | Manufacturer prior at age | 0.548 | 0.540 | 0.000 | 0 | 0 | |||
| General Roof 8 · DATA_HALL_01clean-control candidate | Peer median now | 0.548 | 0.533 | 0.000 | 0 | 0 | |||
| General Roof 9 | Historical best 30d | 0.548 | 0.728 | 0.123 | 3,703 | 53 | |||
| General Roof 9 | Manufacturer prior at age | 0.548 | 0.543 | 0.000 | 0 | 0 | |||
| General Roof 9 | Peer median now | 0.548 | 0.533 | 0.000 | 0 | 0 | |||
| General Roof 10 | Historical best 30d | 0.522 | 0.710 | 0.157 | 4,795 | 41 | |||
| General Roof 10 | Manufacturer prior at age | 0.522 | 0.543 | 0.028 | 875 | 227 | |||
| General Roof 10 | Peer median now | 0.522 | 0.533 | 0.014 | 436 | 455 |
If every inferred as-found degradation state exists at once, this is the facility overhead they cost relative to expected-at-age, and what that overhead would be worth as IT capacity. Constrained-hours fraction is 0 as modeled, so the compute lens is a sensitivity, not a realized value.
SIL = D − ΣA: the combined penalty of all degraded states minus the sum of their individual penalties. Positive means degradations compound.
| Coil fouled | 28,543 |
| Crah filter | 20,370 |
| Roof soiled | 24 |
| Coil fouled | 6,012 |
| Crah filter | 2,557 |
| Roof soiled | 19 |
Energy value, capacity value and compute-opportunity value are three separate lenses on the same recovered kWh/kW. They are never summed. Gross compute revenue is a public price ceiling, not profit; marginal contribution is an ASSUMED sensitivity; both are zero unless facility power or cooling actually constrains compute (constrained-hours fraction is 0 as modeled).